Innovation in Market Research Technology: Reflecting on the Journey

Technological developments within market research have transformed the industry over the past couple of decades. The recent ASC Conference, held in the beautiful Cathedral city of Winchester, offered a welcome opportunity to reflect on these innovations, posing the question, ‘Are we there yet?’ In my opening keynote at the conference, I attempted to provide my own answer to this question – and to do this, I went back to the very beginning.

Where Market Research Began

Where Market Research BeganIn the late 1800s, Charles Booth knocked on doors of people’s homes in a concerted effort to obtain a true measurement and understanding of poverty within London. In doing so, he was one of the early pioneers of the social survey and ethnographic methods.

Over the subsequent eight decades, primary data collection methods remained fairly constant with interviewer-administered and mail surveys on the quantitative side and ethnographic methods, focus groups and individual interviews on the qualitative side.

Computer Technology Shifts Market Research Methods

From the 1970s, the growth and ever-increasing availability of computer technology started to open up the researcher toolkit with the development of various CAI (computer-assisted interviewing) methods. The first of these is computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) devised in the early 1970s. During that decade, it went on to become a widely used research tool in the US but it was only in the early 1980s that it gained extensive use in Europe.

The emergence of laptops in the mid-1980s led to the general use of computer-assisted personal interviewing (CAPI) in survey research. The development of CAPI was initially hindered by the limited capabilities of the first laptops in terms of memory and speed, not to mention the size and weight of the machine.

As the technology improved, computer-assisted survey research became the norm in the early to mid-1990s. At this time, Touch Tone Data Entry (TDE) and Interactive Voice Response (IVR) were also introduced. This decade also saw the emergence of email surveys and early online qualitative approaches with bulletin board discussions.

A Turning Point for Market Research Technology

The turn of the century brought perhaps the most transformative method impacting us today; web surveys, which have morphed into mobile surveys in more recent years. Qualitatively, we’ve seen the introduction of activity-based online methods, webcam interviews, and focus groups.

Pokemon Go PhoneCulturally Relevant Ways to Reach People

All of these approaches provide researchers with multiple ways to reach people and understand their lives. The evolution reflects changes both in technological developments and in culture around us. A perfect example of this is mobile qualitative that can tap into the mainstream culture of content creators and sharers.

From a researcher perspective: what better way to understand people than through their own lens? Furthermore, the method addresses memory and post-rationalization challenges while also being as unobtrusive as far as research can get.

New Technology Enables Blended Methods, Specifically Quant+Qual

Another important advantage of the newer approaches, mainly web-based ones, is the increased feasibility of blended methods, offering reduced time and costs. This is particularly true of triangulating quantitative and qualitative methods providing a full, rich picture of the research topic. However, other mixed-mode approaches, for example, an online diary followed by a webcam interview, also yield powerful insight.

New Market Research Technologies Bring New Challenges

With a great change, comes great (and new) challenges. The variety of methods now at our disposal brings added layers of complexity.

Added Complexity in Market ResearchTechnical Complexity: Each new feature added to a software platform increases its complexity, both in terms of the user experience on the frontend and product internals on the backend.

Methodological Complexity: There are numerous design choices when creating an online questionnaire, and at the same time, fully understanding the implications of the design decisions upon the respondents and the results.

Practical Complexity: The amount of data being returned from even relatively small projects, can be overwhelming. Consider that a recent 7-day FocusVision Revelation study with 72 participants generated more than 1,000 unique responses, 1,200 images, and 170 videos.

Technical Tensions: We demand a clean and simple user experience but ever-increasing numbers of features. Coupled with this, there’s a culture of free technology (think of how many apps on your smartphone that you actually purchased) and expectation is that technology is, if not quite free, very inexpensive.

Methodological Tensions: Methodologically, design choices are often made (or not made) in deference to our quest for standardization and data comparability. A very current tension is the cultural shift to mobile by our respondents and historical web questionnaire design.

Practical Tensions: Time-strapped researchers are on a continual journey to learn new skills to keep abreast of the new approaches with evermore appearing on the horizon.

Key Takeaways from ASC 2016

Returning to the ASC conference, successes (and there were many of them) were generally coupled with complexities and tensions. Take these three examples:

The One-Question Survey

Geoffrey Roughton and Iain MacKay (X-MR) provided a compelling case demonstrating the value of a one-question Google Consumer Survey for political polling tracking. At the same time, they also noted the practical on-going challenge of building out more such uses and methodologically understand why it is working so well.

A Need for Shorter Mobile-First Surveys

Mike Murray & James Eldridge (Research Now) explored the use of Split Questionnaire-Design (SQD), often known as survey modularization. Within the industry, this has long been talked about as an important emerging approach; but as the authors highlighted, a standard methodology for conducting modularization has yet to be developed. Methodologically, we are now on the way to finding a standardized approach; the next challenge is for software providers to build out tools to facilitate the easy adoption of modularization.

Social Media Listening

Social media listening is another emerging method and one that should be more prominent than it is. One of the most refreshing papers came from Jillian Ney, who spoke candidly about the challenges facing social listening research, which is currently a very time intensive endeavor with none of the software providers cracking the code.

So, are we there yet? There’s no question that we’ve come a long way and have an exciting array of approaches to speak to people and understand their lives. But no, we aren’t there yet. It feels safe to say that with all the existing complexities and tensions, which will be closely followed by new ones, our never-ending journey continues.

Share this article:

Add comment

E-mail is already registered on the site. Please use the Login form or enter another.

You entered an incorrect username or password

Sorry, you must be logged in to post a comment.

Begin your journey to better customer insights

Request a demo

Sign up to receive news from FocusVision

We collect this information to send you free content, offers, and product updates. Visit our recently updated privacy policy for details on how we protect and manage your submitted data.